When it was first announced that Fifty Shades of Grey would be made into a movie, the biggest question most people had was how the story in the books would translate to screen. Yes, it’s a love story – but it’s also a story about BDSM and sex, and movies nowadays are notoriously risk-averse when it comes to showing sex on-screen.
It’s an understandable reaction. With most of the box office coming from teens and international audiences, to alienate almost half of your movie-going audiences with an R-rating is almost unheard of. That’s why movies like World War Z, which really should have been an R, went for a watered down version to get the rating to PG-13 instead.
With Universal shelling out big bucks to secure the rights to Fifty Shades of Grey, and a lot of expectation riding on the title, it’s clear that they have high hopes for the film. But considering the plot itself revolves around sex – and very visual sex at that – how will the movies manage to even get an R-rating? The book is soft porn, and there’s no way Universal is going to allow the films to be rated NC-17.
The director, Nowhere Boy’s Sam Taylor-Johnson, was hired for her contemporary and edgy style, so here’s hoping that she’s able to retain the vividness of the book without crossing any studio boundaries. Regardless though, I can’t help but feel that the films will inevitably be much less visual than the books – no matter how much they try to stay true to the source material.
Do you agree? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
If You Want More Hot Celeb Dirty Laundry News Then Please Like Us On Facebook and Follow Us On Twitter!
